Align marketplace categories with Codex taxonomy
Constraint: Keep one EAPIL marketplace while using official Codex category metadata and stable plugin IDs. Rejected: One marketplace per category | Codex groups the UI by marketplace source, which would require users to add multiple markets and change install selectors. Confidence: high Scope-risk: moderate Directive: Keep localized plugins in the same functional category and distinguish them with a language suffix such as -zh. Tested: Marketplace validation, all manifest/category consistency checks, KeyInfo market tests, frontend lint and production build.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
|
||||
"shortDescription": "在根据发明人访谈内容撰写中文专利技术交底书或专利申请文件时使用,尤其适用于软件、人工智能、系统、设备、方法、模型训练、数据处理、视觉监控或工程类发明。也可用于用户收集发明思路、确认技术内容的完整性、准备专利交底书、起草权利要求书/说明书/摘要/附图、将其转换为Word格式,以及评估发明的新颖性、创造性和实用性。",
|
||||
"longDescription": "在根据发明人访谈内容撰写中文专利技术交底书或专利申请文件时使用,尤其适用于软件、人工智能、系统、设备、方法、模型训练、数据处理、视觉监控或工程类发明。也可用于用户收集发明思路、确认技术内容的完整性、准备专利交底书、起草权利要求书/说明书/摘要/附图、将其转换为Word格式,以及评估发明的新颖性、创造性和实用性。",
|
||||
"developerName": "EAPIL",
|
||||
"category": "文档处理",
|
||||
"category": "Productivity",
|
||||
"capabilities": [
|
||||
"Read",
|
||||
"Write"
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user