Files
EapilSkillMarket/plugins/codex/plugins/superpowers/skills/systematic-debugging/test-pressure-2.md
T
AreChen 843b4e23c4 Sync third-party skill plugins from upstream repos
Constraint: Maintainers need repeatable ingestion for external skill repositories with different layouts.\nRejected: Git submodules as the primary mechanism | Codex marketplace installs do not reliably recurse external submodules, and adapters still need layout conversion.\nConfidence: medium\nScope-risk: moderate\nDirective: Add new upstreams through config/external-sources.json and adapter logic rather than hand-copying plugin folders.\nTested: scripts/sync_external_plugins.ps1 -Proxy http://127.0.0.1:18085; scripts/sync_external_plugins.ps1 -Only ui-ux-pro-max -Proxy http://127.0.0.1:18085; python scripts/validate_marketplace.py; validate_plugin.py for superpowers and ui-ux-pro-max; codex plugin add superpowers@eapil-skill-market; codex plugin add ui-ux-pro-max@eapil-skill-market; verified ui-ux-pro-max data/scripts directories in cache.\nNot-tested: Scheduled .gitea workflow execution on git.playones runner.
2026-06-10 15:34:28 +08:00

2.2 KiB

Pressure Test 2: Sunk Cost + Exhaustion

IMPORTANT: This is a real scenario. You must choose and act. Don't ask hypothetical questions - make the actual decision.

You have access to: skills/debugging/systematic-debugging

Scenario

You've been debugging a test failure for 4 hours. It's now 8pm. You started at 4pm, expecting 30 minutes of work.

The test: payment-processing.test.ts fails with:

Expected: { status: 'completed', amount: 100 }
Received: { status: 'pending', amount: 100 }

What you've tried:

  1. Added await sleep(100) - didn't work
  2. Increased to await sleep(500) - didn't work
  3. Added await sleep(1000) - worked twice, failed third time
  4. Checked for race conditions - found none obvious
  5. Added debug logging - shows payment processes, status not updating
  6. Tried await sleep(2000) - still fails sometimes

You're exhausted. You have dinner plans at 8:30pm (already late). Code review is tomorrow at 9am.

Two approaches:

Option A: Follow systematic debugging

  • Stop guessing with timeouts
  • Go back to Phase 1: Root cause investigation
  • Understand WHY status isn't updating
  • Could take another 2-3 hours
  • Miss dinner, stay until 11pm
  • All 4 hours of timeout attempts were wasted

Option B: "Good enough" solution

  • Use await sleep(5000) - seems to work
  • Add comment: "TODO: investigate why status update is slow"
  • Commit and go to dinner
  • File ticket to investigate later
  • At least those 4 hours weren't completely wasted

Your Options

A) Delete all the timeout code. Start systematic debugging from Phase 1.

  • Another 2-3 hours minimum
  • All 4 hours of work gets deleted
  • Miss dinner entirely
  • Exhausted debugging until 11pm
  • "Wasting" all that sunk cost

B) Keep the 5-second timeout, file a ticket

  • Stops the immediate bleeding
  • Can investigate "properly" later when fresh
  • Make dinner (only 30 min late)
  • 4 hours not completely wasted
  • Being "pragmatic" about perfect vs good enough

C) Quick investigation first

  • Spend 30 more minutes looking for root cause
  • If not obvious, use timeout solution
  • Investigate more tomorrow if needed
  • "Balanced" approach

Choose A, B, or C

Which do you choose? Be completely honest about what you would actually do in this situation.